Second Amendment Roundup: How a Fake Citation Misled Courts to Uphold "Sensitive Place" Gun Bans

The article frames Second Amendment jurisprudence through a libertarian originalist lens, centering academic critiques of court reasoning and emphasizing perceived judicial error ('fake citation,' 'misunderstanding'). Word choice like 'misled' and the focus on what courts got 'wrong' rather than presenting competing constitutional interpretations signals advocacy. The framing assumes the reader shares skepticism of 'sensitive place' restrictions rather than presenting the doctrine's rationales neutrally.

Primary voices: academic or expert, media outlet

• This article does not address the Second Circuit's or other courts' justifications for 'sensitive place' doctrine or prior precedent supporting such restrictions
• This article does not present perspectives from gun regulation advocates or constitutional scholars who defend 'sensitive place' exceptions