My Amicus Brief in the Geofence Warrant Case, United States v. Chatrie

This is a technical legal analysis of Fourth Amendment doctrine presented by an expert amicus to the Supreme Court. The framing is balanced and legalistic rather than ideologically charged—the author systematically evaluates competing constitutional arguments (virtual locker theory vs. third-party doctrine, warrant particularity) without advocating for a predetermined outcome. The tone is neutral and analytical, characteristic of academic/expert legal writing rather than advocacy journalism; the piece itself is a brief excerpt explaining the amicus submission rather than editorial commentary.

Primary voices: academic or expert