Laws/Rules Made Up to Apply to Israel

This article employs sarcastically constructed 'rules' to attack international law frameworks applied to Israel, using rhetorical device rather than neutral analysis. The sourcing is minimal (an X/Twitter user challenge), and the framing centers Israeli grievances while dismissing humanitarian law doctrine as invented or selectively applied. Word choice ('made up,' 'invented,' 'supposed') signals delegitimization; no counterarguments from international law experts or Palestinian advocates are presented.

Primary voices: media outlet, anonymous source

• This article does not address the actual text or scholarly consensus on UN Security Council resolutions, Geneva Conventions provisions, or International Court of Justice rulings relevant to Israeli-Palestinian law disputes.
• This article does not present counterarguments from international humanitarian law experts, UN bodies, or Palestinian legal scholars defending the cited frameworks.
• This article does not distinguish between contested interpretations of ambiguous legal questions and invented rules with no doctrinal basis.