This article reports on a court ruling dismissing a lawsuit, centering the judge's findings of litigation misconduct rather than the merits of the plaintiff's claims. The sourcing is judicial (court opinion), and the language is straightforward and factual, presenting the court's characterization without advocacy. The framing is essentially establishment-aligned—emphasizing legal procedure and misconduct findings—though the selective inclusion of inflammatory social media evidence tilts slightly toward the defendant's perspective without explicit editorializing.
Not the misconduct itself, but noted in the court's opinion as one of the items plaintiff had sought to withhold from discovery: "During a separate text conversation on May 11, 2018, Plaintiff texted Mr. Roe: 'If I had 5 dollars for every gender, I would have 5 dollars coz women are objects.'"
Full article not available — click below to read at the source.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.