No First Amendment Exception for Professional-Client Speech: States Can't Ban "Conversion Therapy" Speech for Minors

This article presents Justice Gorsuch's Supreme Court majority opinion with minimal editorial intervention, allowing the judicial reasoning to speak directly. The framing centers the Court's First Amendment logic and treats the decision as a straightforward application of precedent rather than a culturally contested issue.

Primary voices: elected official (Justice Gorsuch/Supreme Court), state or recognized government (Colorado)

• This article does not address the dissenting opinion (Justice Jackson's dissent is mentioned but not substantively explained)
• This article does not include perspectives from medical or mental health organizations regarding conversion therapy's safety or efficacy
• This article does not present arguments from advocates opposed to the decision on child welfare grounds