Government Shouldn't Be Important Enough To Fight Over

This piece employs libertarian framing that critiques government expansion as the root cause of political conflict, a hallmark of right-leaning anti-state philosophy. The argument—that reducing government power would reduce political violence—is presented as a causal solution rather than exploring institutional, polarization, or social factors. Language emphasizes government as the problem ('important enough to fight over'), centering a deregulatory/decentralist perspective typical of Reason magazine's editorial stance.

Primary voices: media outlet

• This article does not address historical causes of political polarization independent of government size
• This article does not cite research on whether reduced government scope empirically correlates with reduced political violence
• This article does not examine competing explanations for contemporary American political conflict (media fragmentation, economic inequality, demographic change)