New York Times exposed for anti-white, anti-male discrimination?  

The article uses loaded framing ('exposed') in the headline and employs charged language ('discrimination') without substantive evidence presented in the excerpt. The stance centers on a symmetrical civil rights argument favoring white males, positioning this as a principled legal position while acknowledging the conventional focus of civil rights advocacy differs.

Primary voices: media outlet

• This article does not address what specific New York Times policies or practices are alleged
• This article does not present evidence from civil rights experts or legal scholars on the merits of the discrimination claim
• This article does not include response from the New York Times or civil rights organizations
• This article does not define what 'anti-white, anti-male discrimination' consists of in concrete terms