Was CASA Really Worth It?
This is explicitly analytical commentary on Supreme Court jurisprudence from a libertarian perspective (Reason magazine). The author critiques the executive branch's strategic concessions in CASA v. USCIS while defending the dissenters' concerns as ultimately vindicated by events.
Primary voices: academic or expert, media outlet
- This article does not explain what the Trump Administration's underlying goal was in seeking CASA relief or what it hoped to accomplish
- This article does not detail the substance of the birthright citizenship executive order or the constitutional claims at stake
- This article does not address how the Court's broader jurisprudence on nationwide injunctions has affected litigation strategy or government operations
As this analysis depends on predicting the Supreme Court's decision on birthright citizenship (described as 'expected' to strike down the order), framing may shift substantially depending on whether t
Opinion/analysisEstablishment framing
The executive branch sacrificed its power to the Supreme Court, yet gained virtually nothing.
Full article not available — click below to read at the source.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.