Trump's Answer to Iran's Hormuz Crisis: Sell Oil We Don't Have

The article employs skeptical, corrective framing toward Trump's claims about U.S. oil production and geopolitical strategy, using precise EIA data and expert quotes to systematically debunk administration statements. Word choices like 'war of choice,' 'rambling, disjointed,' and 'desperate for a solution' carry critical valence. The sourcing centers energy experts and data agencies while positioning Trump's rhetoric as misleading or inaccurate, reflecting Reason magazine's libertarian skepticism of both interventionism and executive overreach.

Primary voices: elected official, state or recognized government, academic or expert, corporate or institutional spokesperson, media outlet

• This article does not address why the Strait of Hormuz was closed or Iran's stated rationale for the action
• This article does not examine potential long-term strategic benefits of U.S. energy independence or supply chain diversification
• This article does not present the administration's defense of its oil production claims or counterarguments to the EIA data presented