
Reason presents the Colorado Court of Appeals ruling through a libertarian-civil-liberties lens, emphasizing the First Amendment violation finding and judicial concern about punishing speech. The article centers the appellate judges' reasoning and cites relevant case law, but frames Peters' conduct (providing election equipment access to a Lindell associate) as subordinate to the sentencing question.
Primary voices: state or recognized government, academic or expert
Framing may shift if Peters seeks further appeal or if the Colorado Supreme Court reviews the sentencing question, potentially clarifying the boundary between punishing speech versus considering it as
But the underlying conviction, for false statements related to getting someone access to Dominion Voting Systems election equipment, was upheld.
Full article not available — click below to read at the source.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.