Israel condemns NYT article on sexual abuse of Palestinians in Israeli prisons
The article centers Israeli government denial equally with allegations of abuse, using the ministry's inflammatory language ('blood libel') without editorial distance or factual context. While Kristof's reporting is described, the framing treats Israel's categorical rejection as a legitimate counterpoint rather than examining evidence. Word choices like 'accused' and 'alleged' create epistemic symmetry between verified testimonies and denials, and the final sentence conflates human rights documentation with geopolitical 'blacklisting,' suggesting bad faith.
Primary voices: state or recognized government, media outlet, academic or expert
- This article does not address the sourcing or methodology of Kristof's reporting or the recent UN and human rights investigations cited in the original NYT piece
- This article does not provide context on the frequency or pattern of such allegations from international bodies or rights organizations
- This article does not clarify what 'blood libel' means or why the Israeli ministry chose this particular historical comparison
Framing may shift as investigations by international bodies or courts proceed; this snapshot reflects initial claim/counter-claim positioning rather than adjudicated facts.
Establishment framingBoth-sides framingCharged language
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused The New York Times of publishing “one of the worst blood libels ever to appear in the modern press” after the newspaper ran an opinion piece by columnist Nicholas Kristof titled The Horror of Sexual Assault in Israeli Prisons.
In a post on X, the ministry said the article falsely portrayed Israel as the guilty party despite Israeli claims that its citizens were victims of sexual violence during the attacks by Hamas on 7 October 2023.
The New York Times article reported allegations of widespread sexual violence by Israeli forces against Palestinians, citing recent reports and first-hand testimonies from detainees.
Kristof wrote that the alleged abuses reflected a pattern of “unrestrained power” within Israeli detention facilities and criticised what he described as international silence over the issue.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry rejected the claims as “baseless lies” and said the publication formed part of a broader “anti-Israel campaign” linked to efforts to place Israel on a blacklist maintained by the United Nations secretary-general.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.