War and/or Peace

This article centers anti-war framing and libertarian skepticism of executive power, employing charged language (describing threatened strikes on civilian infrastructure as 'a war crime,' the tariff policy as 'insanity') and consistently highlighting gaps between stated policy goals and outcomes.

Primary voices: elected official, state or recognized government, academic or expert, media outlet

• This article does not address the stated justification for the Iran military campaign beyond briefly mentioning 'the Iranian government's nuclear weapons program'
• This article does not explain what triggered the recent escalation or the specific context of Trump's speech
• This article does not present the administration's defense of the tariff policy or its intended strategic rationale