Brickbat: Who Are You

The article centers cybersecurity expertise to critique government-backed technology, adopting a skeptical stance toward regulatory overreach without ideological heat. The framing is mildly libertarian (skepticism of EU government action) but grounded in technical competence rather than charged rhetoric. Word choice ('serious flaws,' 'just hours') conveys competent criticism rather than inflammatory language.

Primary voices: academic or expert, state or recognized government

• This article does not address the regulatory rationale or age-protection goals motivating the European Commission's proposal
• This article does not provide details on which specific flaws were identified or their severity
• This article does not include response or context from the European Commission