State vs. Local, State vs. State

The article frames state-led zoning reform skeptically, emphasizing 'popular revolt' and municipal resistance rather than housing supply failures. It centers decentralized, local decision-making as a legitimate counterweight to state intervention—a characteristic libertarian framing. Language is relatively neutral but the selection of which conflicts to highlight (state overreach vs. local autonomy) tilts toward skepticism of top-down policy, consistent with Reason's pro-localism stance.

Primary voices: media outlet

• This article does not address the scale of housing affordability crises or empirical outcomes of zoning reform in other jurisdictions
• This article does not center voices or data from renters or housing advocates directly affected by zoning restrictions
• This article does not examine economic research on how local zoning contributes to wealth inequality and reduced labor mobility