Let's Talk about Neal Katyal's TED Talk

This piece uses informal, colloquial language ('that guy,' Harvey AI comparison) to critique legal figures and Supreme Court reasoning, adopting a skeptical tone toward establishment legal voices. The framing centers Katyal's critique rather than providing substantive legal analysis, and the casual characterization of McConnell and the Court suggests editorial dismissiveness toward mainstream conservative jurisprudence. The sourcing appears limited to Katyal's public remarks, with no counterbalancing expert voices.

Primary voices: media outlet, academic or expert

• This article does not address McConnell's or other justices' substantive responses to Katyal's criticisms
• This article does not provide the full context or substance of Katyal's TED Talk argument