Federal Court: Trump's Newest Tariffs Are Also Illegal

The article uses emphatic language ('Also Illegal,' 'ignored the plain language') that frames the court decision as definitive rather than one judicial ruling among potential appeals. The framing centers on executive overreach and statutory constraint, reflecting libertarian skepticism of executive power. However, Reason's institutional libertarian position emphasizes rule-of-law constraints rather than partisan alignment, and the invocation of statutory language ('plain language,' 'Congress clearly provided') suggests legal argumentation rather than pure advocacy.

Primary voices: state or recognized government

• This article does not address the Trump administration's legal justification for the tariffs under Section 122
• This article does not address the precedent for or against Section 122 invocation in prior administrations
• This article does not provide the full text or reasoning of the court decision