ABA: Law Schools Can Satisfy "Cross-Cultural Competency" Standard By Criticizing DEI

The article frames ABA guidance through a libertarian lens emphasizing institutional autonomy and ideological flexibility, with word choice ('free to determine,' 'if they so choose') that privileges schools' discretion to critique DEI rather than to implement it. The headline itself uses scare quotes and conflation ('Cross-Cultural Competency' equated with DEI criticism) to suggest regulatory overreach.

Primary voices: state or recognized government

• This article does not address the original rationale for cross-cultural competency standards in legal education
• This article does not include perspectives from law schools or accreditors defending DEI requirements
• This article does not explain what prompted the ABA's apparent clarification or pressure from which constituencies