More states weigh new rules for pregnant, postpartum women in custody

The article centers state legislative initiatives without advocacy rhetoric, using neutral descriptive language ('reexamining,' 'reshape'). Sourcing appears to rely on government actors (legislators, presumably state officials) and policy developments rather than activist or reform advocates, lending establishment credibility to what is substantively a reform topic. The framing presents legislative momentum as a factual development rather than campaigning for change, though the subject matter itself (pregnant women's treatment in custody) carries implicit humanitarian concern.

Primary voices: state or recognized government, media outlet

• This article does not address the outcomes or effectiveness of prior similar legislation in other states
• This article does not center voices of incarcerated pregnant women or advocacy organizations focused on criminal justice reform