'Boneless Wings' Aren't Really Wings. Is That Fraud?

The article uses straightforward, factual language examining a consumer complaint about product labeling—presenting the core tension (boneless wings contain no wings, buffalo wings contain no buffalo) without inflammatory framing. Reason's editorial approach here centers consumer skepticism and regulatory clarity rather than ideological positioning, though the libertarian outlet's implicit framing suggests regulatory inconsistency deserves scrutiny. No charged language inflames the issue; the article lets absurdity speak for itself.

Primary voices: corporate or institutional spokesperson, media outlet

• This article does not address whether regulatory agencies (FDA, FTC) have investigated or commented on labeling standards for these products
• This article does not address consumer awareness or complaint data about misleading labeling
• This article does not compare how competitors label similar products