Trump's Iran Deal Looks a Lot Like the Previous Ones He Hated

The article employs strongly charged language ('killing thousands of people,' 'destroying the world economy') to frame Trump's Iran policy as self-contradictory and destructive, without centering administration justifications or expert cost-benefit analyses. The rhetorical question in the lede sets a critical tone rather than neutral framing. Reason's libertarian editorial stance favors non-interventionism, evident in the article's skepticism toward prior Iran policies and apparent new Iran negotiations.

Primary voices: media outlet

• This article does not address Trump administration officials' stated rationales for prior Iran policy decisions
• This article does not present quantified economic or casualty data to support the claims about 'thousands of people' and 'world economy' damage
• This article does not include expert analysis from foreign policy hawks defending the rationale for Iran pressure campaigns