April 1, 2026
This is a first-person commentary from an academic legal analyst reflecting on a hypothetical Supreme Court case set in April 2026. The piece uses measured, scholarly language and presents the legal debate as genuinely contested (noting "this issue is much closer than when I first studied it"), giving credence to arguments on both sides. The author notes his own evolving view, which suggests intellectual honesty rather than partisan advocacy. The tone is observational and reflective rather than charged.
Primary voices: academic or expert
This is a speculative/fictional commentary about future events presented as if they have already occurred; framing reflects the author's intellectual positioning on a contested constitutional question
Opinion/analysisNeutral language
Today is a day unlike any other than I can remember. At 10:00 a.m., the Supreme Court heard oral argument… The post April 1, 2026 appeared first on Reason.com.
Full article not available — click below to read at the source.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.