
This opinion piece frames Supreme Court precedent (Employment Division v. Smith) as settled law unlikely to be overruled, presenting a skeptical view of religious liberty advocates' litigation strategy. The framing relies on institutional analysis and implicit criticism of efforts to challenge established doctrine, using measured but definitive language ('no interest,' 'closest we'll get') that suggests the author views Smith as appropriately stable.
Primary voices: media outlet
This framing may shift if the Court's composition changes or new religious liberty cases reach the docket with different fact patterns.
Fulton was the closest we'll get.
Full article not available — click below to read at the source.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Sign in to leave a comment.